Guardian Unlimited
Go to:  
MediaGuardian.co.ukBroadcast
Home Advertising Television Radio Marketing & PR Press & publishing New media City
Monkey This week The tenner Talk Special reports Trade round-up TV ratings Jobs

Television

  Search this site

Advanced search
 Recent articles
Hat Trick founders sell 45% stake

Sky suspends journalists over bogus story

BBC report gives a fuzzy picture

Commons panel shows corporation has little talent to deceive

Eddie Mair's diary

Active Value retains the 'nuclear option' in Cordiant battle

TV review

Excerpts from BBC annual report

TV taken to task over bad language

The man who is selling the BBC


Special report: Iraq - the media war  |  Television

Sky suspends journalists over bogus story

War dispatch showing 'firing' of cruise missile filmed from docked sub

Matt Wells, media correspondent
Thursday July 17, 2003
The Guardian


Sky News faked a television report from a Royal Navy submarine during the Iraq war, according to a documentary team that filmed on the same vessel.

The Sky report, which was "security cleared" by a Ministry of Defence official and shown on at least one other British TV network, purported to show the preparation and firing of a cruise missile.

But the submarine was docked and the documentary crew says the events were staged for the benefit of Sky's camera.

Last night, after being alerted to the story by the Guardian, Sky launched an investigation and suspended the journalists involved.

The contested report will be shown as part of BBC2's Fighting the War series on Sunday, alongside footage of missiles being fired from HMS Splendid for real.

The BBC2 crew spent 10 days on the submarine, and were alarmed when they saw Sky's report, which was pooled and also shown on ITV News. The allegation raises serious questions about journalistic integrity, and undermines the trust inherent in the pool system. ITV was alarmed that it unwittingly rebroadcast the disputed report.

Neil Grant, the series producer of Fighting the War, said: "Viewers need to be able to trust the editorial integrity of a news report. People assume that what they see on the news is for real. This sort of thing undermines the journalistic community of which we are part."

Sky's reporter, James Forlong, opens his film with the words: "Beneath the waters of the Persian Gulf, [this is] the nuclear powered submarine HMS Splendid and the final moments before a cruise missile is launched." The clear implication is that the sub is at sea; but the MoD has confirmed it was docked. Its location is known to the Guardian, but remains classified. No missile was launched while the Sky team was on board.

Forlong continues: "The coordinates set, the target many miles over the horizon." Members of the crew are seen examining a screen, and looking through the periscope. "Missile seen to fly," says one, and a picture is shown of a missile shooting into the air from under the water.

But the BBC documentary alleges that the crew members were simply re-enacting their drill for the benefit of the camera. There was no target, and the pictures of the cruise missile were taken from library footage.

A crew member is then shown apparently steering the submarine, and others are seen sitting in the mess. Both sequences were staged, according to the BBC.

One version of the report, which was shown in various forms between March 31 and April 2, ends with a close-up of a finger pushing a red button marked "Fire". But the BBC documentary shows that Splendid's missiles are fired by computer.

One HMS Splendid crew member tells the BBC: "A left mouse push fires it. Kinda crazy really. We actually asked for a great big red button, but they wouldn't give us one."

Mr Grant said yesterday: "When viewers are watching something, they need to believe that what they are seeing is true."

Sky staff were said to be "shell-shocked" at the suspensions of Forlong and producer Lucy Chaytor. Nick Pollard, head of Sky News, said last night: "We are fiercely proud of our reputation for accuracy and integrity in our reporting. This allegation has come as a complete surprise and will be fully investigated."

A Navy spokesman said: "The MoD offered to Sky TV, on a pooled basis, a facility to illustrate the preparations for and the procedures involved in the firing of a Tomahawk land attack missile, filmed in an ex ercise context. Considerations of operational security at the time in relation to the activities of the submarine meant that the media facility had to be conducted under carefully prescribed security conditions."

ITV News said: "We didn't know there was any question over the validity of this report. As members of a pool, we would routinely expect the highest of journalistic standards from other members of the pool. We in turn would police very carefully the accuracy of our own pool contributions."

 Related articles
09.07.2003: Iraqi TV was coalition's 'stuff of dreams'
28.05.2003: BBC defies MoD over Iraq documentary
28.05.2003: Rageh to riches
20.05.2003: Don't rely on embeds, urges BBC mine victim
08.05.2003: ITC tackles Fox News bias claims
25.04.2003: Turner: Murdoch is a 'warmonger'
24.04.2003: Dyke attacks 'unquestioning' US media
24.04.2003: Arab world now faces invasion by American TV
23.04.2003: BBC fought a good war
17.04.2003: Americans turn to BBC for war news
17.04.2003: Towards Freedom broadcasts democracy to Iraq
14.04.2003: Sky News scales back Iraq operation
14.04.2003: US broadcasters' war stance under scrutiny
14.04.2003: Why should the Iraqis believe US TV?
13.04.2003: BBC defends its reporter in Baghdad
12.04.2003: BBC under fire over chaos reports
11.04.2003: Blair and Bush broadcast TV messages to Iraqis
11.04.2003: US to beam American news into Iraq
10.04.2003: Blair launches new Iraqi TV
10.04.2003: Middle East gets another view of fall of Baghdad
10.04.2003: Tony Blair's address on Towards Freedom TV
09.04.2003: BBC hits back at Ark Royal reports
09.04.2003: ITV and BBC break schedules for 'fall' of Baghdad
08.04.2003: HMS Ark Royal switches off BBC
08.04.2003: Iraqi TV and radio off air
07.04.2003: Burridge: war is not 'infotainment'
07.04.2003: Political donations by US media companies
04.04.2003: Sky winning news battle
03.04.2003: American broadcasters count cost of war
02.04.2003: Sambrook admits 'unfortunate' war comments
01.04.2003: Fox told to remove Rivera from Iraq
31.03.2003: Arnett fired by NBC after Iraqi TV outburst
31.03.2003: Brulé declares global news ambitions
31.03.2003: Iraqi TV back on air
31.03.2003: Peter Arnett in Iraqi TV propaganda row
31.03.2003: Reuters TV forced to pull plug on CNN
31.03.2003: Rivera gets army boot out of Iraq
31.03.2003: War reporting 'changed forever' says BBC
30.03.2003: Downing St in BBC 'bias' row
29.03.2003: C4 delays film on US army hangings
28.03.2003: Appetite for news soars
28.03.2003: BBC boss admits 'daily' mistakes in Iraq
28.03.2003: BBC chiefs stress need to attribute war sources
28.03.2003: Blair's 'execution' claim disputed by soldier's family
28.03.2003: Film of PoWs within Geneva rules
28.03.2003: Start of television war brings big ratings rise
28.03.2003: War boosts demand for feelgood TV
27.03.2003: Attack on television station condemned
27.03.2003: British take over Iraqi TV in Basra
27.03.2003: Fox challenges CNN's US ratings dominance
27.03.2003: Television agendas shape images of war
27.03.2003: US TV mogul spearheads Arabic 'hearts and minds' network
26.03.2003: BBC man criticises 'war bias'
26.03.2003: Bell calls for caution in war reporting
26.03.2003: Hoon: TV stations can be targets
26.03.2003: Reporting truth about war proving difficult, says BBC news chief
26.03.2003: TV station attack could be illegal
25.03.2003: BBC pledges sensitivity in war coverage
25.03.2003: CNN defies Pentagon pictures plea
25.03.2003: Footage of captives puts news channels under pressure from Pentagon
25.03.2003: War-torn Oscars hit ratings low
24.03.2003: War is on, and the bulletins are flying
21.03.2003: 'Shock and awe, coming up soon'
21.03.2003: US networks suffer as advertisers abandon ship
20.03.2003: BBC to canvass world opinion on US
20.03.2003: ITV advertisers hold off on new campaigns
19.03.2003: BBC reveals plans for 'definitive' war documentary
19.03.2003: ITV condemns BBC over news schedules
18.03.2003: BBC and ITV clash over war bulletins
18.03.2003: Flood of complaints as BBC postpones Israel investigation
17.03.2003: News teams prepare for war
10.03.2003: Channel 4 News plans breakfast manoeuvres
07.03.2003: BBC editorial rules spark accusations of anti-war bias
07.03.2003: Blair faces anger in MTV grilling
07.03.2003: C4 staff concerned over war bulletin
04.03.2003: Dimbleby drafted in to ITV's war line-up
04.03.2003: Thousands of Americans want to oust their president. The anti-war one, that is
03.03.2003: TV news gears up for ratings battle
28.02.2003: Rather's Hussein scoop draws 17m
27.02.2003: US reporters condemn Pentagon press controls
27.02.2003: White House clash with TV chiefs
26.02.2003: Portrait: Veteran American broadcaster Dan Rather
26.02.2003: MoD climbs down over Iraq reports
25.02.2003: Hewitt threatens to sue Fox News
24.02.2003: Blair talks war with MTV generation
21.02.2003: Channel 4 launches midday news
19.02.2003: Campbell set for TV grilling
19.02.2003: News media harden anti-US stance
17.02.2003: Iraq ejects Fox News crew
11.02.2003: BBC bans news stars from anti-war march
05.02.2003: Saddam tells Benn: We deny all US charges
04.02.2003: Broadcasters fight for Benn's Saddam scoop
04.02.2003: Saddam interview goes to C4
28.01.2003: BBC in talks over war documentary
28.01.2003: C5 triumphs over BBC in naval battle
BBC adopts war footing






Printable version | Send it to a friend | Save story




UP

MediaGuardian.co.uk © Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003